RE: Waiting lists | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: lilbert (lilbertconcentric.net) | |
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1998 11:42:54 -0500 |
It just occurred to me that something may be missing here that I forgot to mention. This message is for anyone who is trying to attract more people. Is it a requirement that all members of your group be "attached" to a house? With Southside Park we had members who didn't have a unit right up to a few months before move-in! I myself changed units twice. If our group had not been flexible about this, there would be valuable members who would never have joined. At one point after I joined, (4 months before move in), we had something like four families who didn't fit in with the units we had for sale! If your concentration is on homebuying instead of community building, I could see why some people would be jittery. I'm not saying leave it to the last minute- these were problems for us, not a devil-may-care attitude problem. But the people were more important than the houses, and lo and behold, it worked out; I firmly believe because the community came first, not the houses. You might consider having a category of membership where the people don't have to have a unit slated for them. I can't imagine how we would have done this any other way. Obviously, there are limitations to this, but do keep an open mind. Liz Stevenson Southside Park Cohousing
- Re: Waiting Lists, (continued)
- Re: Waiting Lists Susan Cameron, August 28 1998
- Re: waiting lists Ruby44444, August 28 1998
- RE: Waiting lists Joani Blank, August 29 1998
- RE: Waiting lists lilbert, August 29 1998
- RE: Waiting lists lilbert, August 30 1998
- Waiting Lists Becky Schaller, September 1 1998
- Re: Waiting Lists Denise Meier and/or Michael Jacob, September 2 1998
- Re: Waiting Lists necwest, September 3 1998
- Re: Waiting Lists Victoria, November 1 1999
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.