Fixing the Mentally Ill! | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: mdutton (mdutton![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 11:03:01 -0600 (MDT) |
It also sounds to me unlikely that this person will continue with the group but if groups cannot manage with members who need fixing, who is to be the judge of that? I think Sociocracy has a lot to offer this type of situation. Everyone who objects or wants changes has to present "reasonable" arguments. I also have to respond to the suggestion that being inclusive with people with mental illness in Cohousing won't work! Many people with mental illnesses function just fine in shared situations. Being dysfunctional has nothing to do with being mentally ill. Many people with personality disorders or character flaws have no diagnosis. Most People with mental illnesses seek support beyond their home neighbourhood...from professionals and support groups. For a time I ran a housing program for people with mental health difficulties (which is how we preferred to refer to people...rather than as being "mentally ill") 6/7 people shared large suburban bungalows in a self help program. A Peer Support program had trained volunteers facilitate weekly meetings of the residents. Of course there were challenges but for the most part these folks formed strong bonds with one another...in spite of sharing less space and facilities than was optimum. Maggie Dutton, Director of Work Enjoyment, http://www.thehomesproject.shawbiz.ca/ H.O.M.E.S. Housing Ourselves Made Easy Society "creating a better way to live, one neighbourhood at a time" in Fort McMurray, AB >Well, I have to disagree. I have been a member of this list for too long, and a member of a working community for too long to not be aware of all the groups that have folded because their process didn't work, often because of only a few people or one person. I think it's certainly worth trying to fix, before summarily ousting her from the group, but I wouldn't bet a nickel on her continuing in any healthy way with the group. For crying out loud, this is a community, not a therapy group! If we had tried to fix everyone who wanted to be a part of our community but wasn't ready to live in community, we would never have gotten built. There is a time to put the continued existence of the group above one persons needs, and that time is ALL THE TIME. I understand the desire to be inclusive, but it won't work with mentally ill people. Cohousing groups aren't psychiatrists. -- Liz Stevenson Southside Park Cohousing Sacramento, California tamgoddess [at] attbi.com _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- Control freaks and groups, (continued)
-
Control freaks and groups Rob Sandelin, April 23 2003
- Re: Control freaks and groups Sharon Villines, April 23 2003
- Hijacking the process Rob Sandelin, April 24 2003
-
Control freaks and groups Rob Sandelin, April 23 2003
-
Re: Subject: Re: [C-L]_Dealing with difficult personalities Elizabeth Stevenson, April 23 2003
- Fixing the Mentally Ill! mdutton, April 23 2003
- Re: Fixing the Mentally Ill! Elizabeth Stevenson, April 23 2003
- Is mental illness the issue? Racheli Gai, April 24 2003
- Re: Is mental illness the issue? Sharon Villines, April 24 2003
- Re: Is mental illness the issue? Racheli Gai, April 24 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.