Re: Diversity | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Lyle Scheer (wonko![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 10:48:15 -0800 (PST) |
On 2/23/23 9:43 AM, Diana Carroll wrote:
These aren't "rules", they are guidelines. There's nothing to "consent" to. To the extent that they are rules, they are established and enforced by our culture, not by this website. A bad apology is a bad apology; these guidelines will help people not make bad apologies. Bad apologies are often an example of microaggressions, in fact. Effectively "I'm sorry y'all are so sensitive".
Or perhaps they are cultural differences.For example... in my understanding of the culture of Japan, if one is in a car accident, one raised in that culture is likely to get out of the car and immediately apologize to the other driver, meaning, "I'm sorry we're in this situation together." This can be completely misconstrued in another culture, which assumes the person apologizing is admitting fault.
Similarly, a web site with "guidelines" to an apology assumes certain norms, or perhaps you might call them rules, about apologies.
If cohousing is to embrace diversity, I believe it must embrace differences in culture, which may mean that what you expect you may not receive, and alternate methods of expression may not be something you fully relate to. Rather than becoming offended and demanding remonstrance in the currency you are used to, it might be a wiser choice to rather try to understand where the other person is coming from.
Otherwise, I fear true diversity is unobtainable. I mean... look at this thread!
- Lyle
- Re: Diversity, (continued)
- Re: Diversity Margo Solod, February 23 2023
- Re: Diversity Kathleen Lowry, February 23 2023
- Re: Diversity Diana Carroll, February 23 2023
- Re: Diversity Kathleen Lowry, February 23 2023
- Re: Diversity Lyle Scheer, February 23 2023
- Re: Diversity Lauren Carter, February 24 2023
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.