Re: community agreements on conflict resolution | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:27:48 -0800 (PST) |
> On Nov 13, 2024, at 12:25 PM, R Philip Dowds via Cohousing-L <cohousing-l > [at] cohousing.org> wrote: > > There’s always the possibility that “irrational" interpersonal conflict > impacts the community's quality of life. For instance, some members > seriously dislike and mistrust each other but somehow end up in the same > meetings and events anyway. Their chronic bickering and sniping ruin > everything for everyone. They refuse to back off and stand down, so the > community … does what? In sociocratic schools, the children do rounds whenever something disturbs the harmonious functioning of the classroom. How are you feeling/thinking? What is affecting you? What do you think is going on? How can it be fixed for you? The function of a round is to equalize the energy in the room. Part of that is bringing all the information into the circle. No two people exist in a group alone. The whole group is part of the dynamic. An interesting insight I gained from recent discussions by political consultants about how to change people’s minds— the subject was Trump voters who think he is truthful. The answer was that the voter has to hear from every kind of person — a trusted expert, a volunteer knocking on their door, a neighbor, a cousin, a woman behind a counter, a child, etc. People respond differently to different sources. You never know who will have the response that will change someone's thinking. A round gives equal respect to everyone and it also gives equal responsibility and agency. There is a good chance that one of those people will reveal a part of the conflict that others have not understood—even something that explains the two people to each other. We don’t all know why something pisses us off or makes us feel ignored. And not everyone who is part of the seemingly obvious dynamic between two people realizes that they are also contributing to the conflict. Like every child grows up in a different family, we all speak a different language. Words = assumptions. Many of us speak several languages — to understand what someone means requires locating them in a language. Are they speaking from a world of oppression? Of being privileged? Of medicine — the world of keeping people uninfected? From the world of bodywork believing that the body is part of communication? One of my eternal frustrations about cohousing is people who don’t want to attend meetings or have email discussions. What is their idea about how we can understand each other well enough to resolve conflicts? Resolving a conflict requires understanding the issues. How do you plan to do that? Or do you want to just vote? Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
-
community agreements on conflict resolution Frances Spector, November 11 2024
-
Re: community agreements on conflict resolution Alicia George, November 12 2024
-
Re: community agreements on conflict resolution Muriel Kranowski, November 12 2024
- Re: community agreements on conflict resolution R Philip Dowds, November 13 2024
- Re: community agreements on conflict resolution Sharon Villines, November 13 2024
- Re: community agreements on conflict resolution Elizabeth Magill, November 13 2024
-
Re: community agreements on conflict resolution Muriel Kranowski, November 12 2024
-
Re: community agreements on conflict resolution Alicia George, November 12 2024
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.