Re: Diversity | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 09:14:16 -0800 (PST) |
> On Feb 23, 2023, at 11:49 AM, Elizabeth Magill <pastorlizm [at] gmail.com> > wrote: > > That is not creating a rule, that is people saying "to apologize you > have to admit to what you did wrong rather than blame me for > misunderstanding you". No, they cited an article that apparently explains what a good apology is from their point of view and in the words they believe should be used. > "to apologize you have to admit to what you did wrong rather than blame me > for misunderstanding you". What is this but a rule? > If you, Sharon, would like to accept that apology, please feel free to > do so. But I would prefer if you would not pretend that the statement > "that's not an apology" means that someone is creating a rule. That > distracts the conversation to what is a rule and what is not, > rather than whether or not the hurt parties have been attended to. I’m not pretending. I’m pointing out that making judgments is using a rule to state that something is good or bad. Stating requirements is not in the best interests of understanding the person from whom they expect an apology. Diversity goes both ways. Knowing Zev even slightly, I have no doubt that he did not intend to hurt anyone’s feelings and he has said that. This will also put my head even firmer on the chopping block, but I’m the only one who can hurt my feelings. I can feel rejected or dismissed or put down, but all those are my own reactions over which I have complete control. They tell me what my expectations or desires were or are. They tell me nothing about the other person unless I know the person and understand their context. I don’t think anyone in this conversation understands Zev. Stating how one feels is certainly important and welcome in a discussion like this. Demanding that other people address my feelings is not something I would expect. Asking for an explanation is perfectly reasonable. Once received, I might ask another question to clarify the response. I might even say that doesn’t make sense to me. But I don’t have the right to demand that the other person do what I think they should do. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
- Re: Diversity, (continued)
- Re: Diversity Kathleen Lowry, February 22 2023
-
Re: Diversity Hafidha Sofia, February 22 2023
- Re: Diversity Sharon Villines, February 23 2023
- Re: Diversity Elizabeth Magill, February 23 2023
- Re: Diversity Sharon Villines, February 23 2023
- Re: Diversity Elizabeth Magill, February 23 2023
- Re: Diversity Kathleen Lowry, February 23 2023
- Re: Diversity Hafidha Acuay, February 23 2023
- Re: Diversity Sophie Rubin, February 23 2023
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.