Re: Diversity | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Hafidha Acuay (hafidhaao![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 12:22:51 -0800 (PST) |
To Sharon, To be clear, I did not ask for an apology. My feelings aren't hurt. I am content to simply see Zev as who he is: a person who is NOT helpful to the specific cause of racial diversity in co-housing. I put you and several others in the same category. (I have been on this listserv for years.) To everyone, I know and fully accept that many (maybe most) people in co-housing communities suffer from anti-Blackness and racist conditioning and beliefs. It's unsurprising that they practice micro-aggressive and overtly racist behaviors. The problem we're dealing with right now is *white people unable to cope with the consequences of their unattractive behavior simply being seen for what it is*. They want to be given more credit than is due - so they bring in their intentions and their general 'goodness.' Or they accuse others of being narrow-minded or 'making assumptions' about their character. Our behavior reveals our character. Telling people to not hold your own words and behavior 'against' you is self-serving, period. This kind of kerfuffle is a major reason why so many Black, Brown, and other people of color shy away from cohousing communities that are white-led and white-centered. The hypocrisy is too much to live with. It's *disheartening* to be undermined and gaslit on very small incidents; and having lived in community we should all know that our ability to deal with small problems prepares us to deal with medium sized and BIG problems. Despite all this, I have hope! I remain in these spaces because my own community has been doing the slow and steady work of self-examination, and review of the racial and socioeconomic obstacles to true inclusive building of community. Is it 100% participation? No, but I have faith and am encouraged. We don't need 100% engagement. I believe there are enough white people and POC throughout the cohousing movement to push this forward and prepare us for a healthier future. The people who can't comprehend this or feel anxious about this can step aside. hafidha On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:26 AM Sharon Villines via Cohousing-L < cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> wrote: > > On Feb 23, 2023, at 11:49 AM, Elizabeth Magill <pastorlizm [at] gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > That is not creating a rule, that is people saying "to apologize you > > have to admit to what you did wrong rather than blame me for > > misunderstanding you". > > No, they cited an article that apparently explains what a good apology is > from their point of view and in the words they believe should be used. > > > "to apologize you have to admit to what you did wrong rather than blame > me for misunderstanding you". > > What is this but a rule? > > > If you, Sharon, would like to accept that apology, please feel free to > > do so. But I would prefer if you would not pretend that the statement > > "that's not an apology" means that someone is creating a rule. That > > distracts the conversation to what is a rule and what is not, > > rather than whether or not the hurt parties have been attended to. > > I’m not pretending. I’m pointing out that making judgments is using a rule > to state that something is good or bad. Stating requirements is not in the > best interests of understanding the person from whom they expect an > apology. Diversity goes both ways. Knowing Zev even slightly, I have no > doubt that he did not intend to hurt anyone’s feelings and he has said > that. > > This will also put my head even firmer on the chopping block, but I’m the > only one who can hurt my feelings. I can feel rejected or dismissed or put > down, but all those are my own reactions over which I have complete > control. They tell me what my expectations or desires were or are. They > tell me nothing about the other person unless I know the person and > understand their context. I don’t think anyone in this conversation > understands Zev. > > Stating how one feels is certainly important and welcome in a discussion > like this. Demanding that other people address my feelings is not something > I would expect. Asking for an explanation is perfectly reasonable. Once > received, I might ask another question to clarify the response. I might > even say that doesn’t make sense to me. But I don’t have the right to > demand that the other person do what I think they should do. > > Sharon > ---- > Sharon Villines > Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC > http://www.takomavillage.org > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://L.cohousing.org/info > > > > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Hafidha Sofía Acuay pronouns: she/her cell: (503)750-7550 email: hafidha.AO [at] gmail.com
- Re: Diversity, (continued)
- Re: Diversity Elizabeth Magill, February 23 2023
- Re: Diversity Sharon Villines, February 23 2023
- Re: Diversity Elizabeth Magill, February 23 2023
- Re: Diversity Kathleen Lowry, February 23 2023
- Re: Diversity Hafidha Acuay, February 23 2023
- Re: Diversity Sophie Rubin, February 23 2023
- Re: Diversity Sharon Villines, February 23 2023
- Re: Diversity Hafidha Sofia, February 23 2023
- Re: Diversity Margo Solod, February 23 2023
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.